AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+2330%
5.834 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Embedded
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
96
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF117
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
