Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1335MHz vs 1219MHz)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +338%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Mobile
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GA107S
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy