Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition +2897%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
993 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-GT
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy