AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock2920MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+2235%
47.84 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2025
Release Date
Jul 2022
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1660 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2920 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2518 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
644.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
64
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
373.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
747.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
95.68 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
1495 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 48
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Navi 48 XTW
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
53.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
357 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
