AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (2920MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+1579%
47.84 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2025
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1660 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2920 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2518 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
644.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
64
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
373.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
747.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
95.68 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
1495 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 48
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 48 XTW
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
53.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
357 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
