NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+539%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
