NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1785MHz vs 1506MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla P6
+68%
6.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1012 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
