Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +1205%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy