NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+59%
3.656 TFLOPS
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
