NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+352%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
