NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+12661%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
17W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
