NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1733MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+167%
8.873 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3220
Quadro P5000
+96%
6335
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
1505
Quadro P5000
+92%
2900
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
