NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+344%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
