NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1620MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+11%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+53%
3220
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
1505
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+14%
1723
Blender
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+100%
463
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
OctaneBench
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+31%
71
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
9
1024
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
