Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1480MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +118%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy