NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (1645MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+255%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P6000
+329%
8898
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P6000
+340%
4147
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro P6000
+181%
825
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
2304
240
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GK110B
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
