NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1645MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+26%
12.63 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Pascal
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
3840
Shading Units
3584
240
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
TU102
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
