NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1645MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
12.63 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+9%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Pascal
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
108
3840
Shading Units
6912
240
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
400W
600 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GA100
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
