NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2050MHz vs 1645MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
12.63 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+32%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
DG2-512
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
