NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1950MHz vs 1645MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+216%
12.63 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
