Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +1930%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
240
240
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
188W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy