Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1747MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +936%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
314 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy