NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1747MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+372%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
5
2560
Shading Units
640
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
47W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
