Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1543MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +382%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy