Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1493MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +209%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
Quadro K5200 +295%
293
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy