NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2050MHz vs 1733MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.5GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000
8.873 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+89%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1607 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
180W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
DG2-512
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
