Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile +1032%
6.48 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P5000 Mobile +1494%
558
Quadro K2000M
35
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK107
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy