Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1747MHz vs 1543MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +61%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy