Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1635MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
A10M +365%
23.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
7168
112
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net