NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+7410%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
1792
Shading Units
32
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
