NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
We compared a Professional market GPU: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and a Desktop platform GPU: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1493MHz vs 1470MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+77%
6.774 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2200
3410
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+42%
4853
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2200
1536
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+42%
2182
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 30
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1042 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
96bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
18
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
40
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
