NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1493MHz vs 1404MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+31%
5.032 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2200
322
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+23%
397
OctaneBench
Quadro P2200
63
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+34%
85
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
192bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
40
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
