NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
+17272%
3.822 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
40
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
