NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+123%
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
