NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+1193%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
12
1152
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
