NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+8397%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
2
1152
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
