NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 24GB VRAM Tesla P40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P40 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1531MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (347.1GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla P40
+295%
11.76 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
Tesla P40
+285%
8079
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
1723
Tesla P40
+126%
3894
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Tesla P40
+245%
797
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Tesla P40
+207%
166
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
347.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
30
1152
Shading Units
3840
72
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.4 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
183.7 GFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.76 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
367.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GP102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
