NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+189%
2.974 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
14
1152
Shading Units
448
72
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
