NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+812%
2.974 TFLOPS
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
