NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
Quadro M5000M
+34%
2810
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+31%
1723
Quadro M5000M
1312
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Quadro M5000M
+19%
275
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Quadro M5000M
+12%
61
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
1536
72
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
