NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+543%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
24
1152
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
