NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1480MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+633%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
108
640
Shading Units
6912
40
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GA100
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
