NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
16376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+249566%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
1024
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
