Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +219%
4.252 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF110
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy