NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
+313%
4.252 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
247W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF110
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
