Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (2475MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +2015%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
18176
128
TMUs
568
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
AD102
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy