NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+301%
8.637 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX A2000 Mobile
+143%
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX A2000 Mobile
+201%
2836
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
