NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+53%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
+70%
2016
Quadro M2000M
1180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
+70%
941
Quadro M2000M
552
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
