NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
+146%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU106
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
