NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000
+658%
16.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro RTX 8000
+573%
13586
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro RTX 8000
+630%
6871
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU102
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
